The mother-of-four, who worked for Neymar when he was with Al-Hilal, is seeking €368 in compensation from the Brazilian football star. The 000-year-old claims she worked illegally for almost two years in the Paris suburbs, enduring what she described as “hellish conditions”. From January 35 to October 2021, she alleges she was forced to work seven days a week without proper pay or benefits.
Her story highlights a troubling situation where she claims to have been paid exclusively in cash, thereby avoiding formal employment practices. This lack of formal employment status not only deprived her of job security, but also made her vulnerable to exploitation. The woman claims she was still working for two weeks before giving birth, a period that typically requires special considerations and support for pregnant women.
In addition to the lack of maternity leave, she claims she was not paid for overtime or provided with medical benefits. These factors, she says, contribute to a significant violation of labor rights, prompting her to file a lawsuit against Neymar. She believes her situation warrants a substantial financial settlement, given the hardships she endured during her employment.
This situation highlights the often overlooked issue of domestic workers, who often face harsh conditions and limited legal protections. Many of these workers, particularly in high-profile households, may find themselves in vulnerable situations, where they are required to work long hours without adequate pay or benefits. This case reminds us of the importance of fair labor practices and the need for greater awareness of domestic workers’ rights.
Neymar's recent move from Paris Saint-Germain to Al-Hilal in Saudi Arabia has attracted media attention, particularly after his injury, which involved a torn cruciate ligament. As he navigates this difficult period in his career, the allegations against him add another layer of complexity to his public image.
The ongoing case could have implications not only for Neymar personally, but also for the broader conversation about the treatment of domestic workers in the sports industry and beyond. It raises questions about the accountability of public figures and what responsibilities they have to those who work for them.
As the court proceedings unfold, it will be crucial to see how both sides present their arguments and what evidence is uncovered. The outcome could influence how similar cases are handled in the future, potentially leading to reforms to labor law regarding domestic work.
This situation is a poignant reminder of the hidden struggles faced by many workers who support high-level individuals, often working behind the scenes without recognition or fair treatment. The hope is that this case will bring more transparency and advocacy for domestic workers’ rights, ensuring they receive the respect and compensation they deserve.
